5.1 Buying 101
You walk into an Abercrombie & Fitch store at the mall, and without thinking about it, you turn to the right and make your way through the denim, past the belts, and to the sweaters. You are so engaged in the experience that you didn’t even realize that the huge mural at the entrance to the store serves a purpose other than to make you look twice at the model in the larger-than-life photo. Before you know it, one of the salespeople dressed in Abercrombie from head to toe approaches you with a smile. “These hoodies are awesome,” they say as you pick up the pale blue one.
Shopping. It’s the national pastime for some but a detested necessity for others. Whether you love shopping (“Oh, that is sooooooo cute!”) or do everything to avoid it (“I’m not going to the mall, no matter what”), it is a major source of spending in North America. In fact, the retail industry generated $14.795 trillion in sales in 2019 (yes, trillion).[1] That’s a lot of selling—and a lot of buying. Pet food alone contributed over $31 million in sales in 2020.[2] That’s a lot of pet food! But what makes you stop and pick up one sweater but not another or one bag of parakeet birdseed over another?
What makes you buy a pair of jeans you weren’t even looking for? What makes you walk out of the store spending more than you had planned (Consumers usually spend more than they planned.)[3]
Inside Consumer Behaviour
The science of consumer behaviour describes and even defines how you shop and, more importantly, why you buy. Smart retailers study consumer behaviour patterns and lay out their stores and merchandise accordingly. For example, did you know that 86 percent of women look at price tags when they shop, while only 72 percent of men do?[4] And did you know that the average shopper doesn’t actually notice anything that’s in the entrance of a store?
According to Paco Underhill, CEO and founder of EnviroSell, and author of the book Why We Buy: The Science of Shopping, consumers do not actually begin shopping until a certain point after they enter the store. That is why smart retailers include a “transition zone” at the entry to their store; it allows customers to get their bearings and choose their shopping paths. In other words, products, signs, and displays that are in the very front of the store might not be seen if there is not a transition for the customers when they enter.
In the case of Abercrombie & Fitch, the transition is the space just inside the entrance that includes the humongous photo of the Abercrombie model du jour. When you go into Hollister, it is the outside porch that serves the same purpose; it is a transition that allows you to get your focus and plot your course in the store, even if you do not consciously realize it. Think about the last time you went into a grocery store or drug store; you might not have noticed anything until you were well inside the store, which means that the merchandise and signs that were displayed in the area before you got your bearings were virtually invisible to you.[5] Subconsciously, you adjust your eyes to the light, process any smells and sounds, notice the temperature, if it is busy and the general layout of the store when you first enter before you think about the actual shopping.[6] “Rather than waste the space with a cluttered front entrance that has little chance of being noticed, it’s better to create an effective transition zone”.
Understanding how and why customers buy can make a significant difference in how you sell. Is the product a considered purchase, like a computer or car or an impulse buy, like a sweater or music download? Is the product bought frequently, like an energy drink, or only once every few years or even once in a lifetime, like a car or a college education? For each of these products, the customer goes through a buying process. Understanding the customer and the buying process can make your selling efforts successful.
Watch the video featuring Martin Lindstrom, the author of Buyology: Truths and Lies about Why We Buy for an overview of the science of consumer behaviour in selling and marketing.
Do You Need It or Want It?
Think of something you need, like an annual medical checkup, a new apartment because your lease is up, or even food to survive. There are some products and services you purchase solely because you cannot exist without them. Now think about something you want: a new pair of jeans, an iPhone, and tickets to a concert. There is a significant difference in what motivates you to buy products and services you need, compared to those you want.
Needs versus Wants
Needs are essentials, those products and services you literally cannot live without. Food, shelter, clothing, transportation, and health care are all examples of needs. Wants, on the other hand, are products, services, and activities that can improve your quality of life; you don’t need them to exist, but rather you desire to have them because you think they will make you happy.[7] Cell phones, vacations, sporting events, restaurants, amusement parks, cable television, and fashion are all examples of wants. People are motivated differently depending on if they are making a purchase for a need or a want. Could you see how cellphones could be argued as a need and a want?
Needs and wants have different motivations. Think about buying a computer; you could focus on the functional attributes of the car such as miles per gallon, maintenance costs, and safety ratings. Functional attributes fit within utilitarian needs –those needs that are necessary.[8]
So, if those were your only needs, you might choose a Smart Fortwo, Ford Focus, or Toyota Prius. But you might want to have something a bit sportier, maybe even flashy, to get around campus, you might choose a Mini Cooper, Jeep, or even a BMW. These cars would do more than simply provide transportation; they would meet your hedonic needs—those needs that are associated with pleasure, feeling, emotion and senses.[9]
You might choose to buy a Mini Cooper because you can customize the design online. That would certainly meet a need other than providing basic transportation. Some people buy a BMW because they want the status that goes with owning that make of car, or perhaps they think that having a Mercedes-Benz means they have arrived. When you understand the difference between needs and wants and between utility needs and hedonic needs, you are better able to tailor your selling communications.
- Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2020, April 2). National Income and Product Accounts Tables. Table 1.1.5. Nominal GDP. https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/?reqid=19&step=2&isuri=1&categories=survey ↵
- Statistica Consumer market outlook. (2019, April). Pet food. https://www-statista-com.libsecure.camosun.bc.ca:2443/outlook/40130000/100/pet-food/worldwide#market-volume ↵
- Petro, G. (2019, March 29). Consumers are spending more per visit in-store than online. What does this mean for retailers? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/gregpetro/2019/03/29/consumers-are-spending-more-per-visit-in-store-than-online-what-does-this-man-for-retailers/#41c6599c7543 ↵
- Proctor, C. (2017, January 27). Here’s how different men and women are when it comes to shopping-and why you need to know. Washington Business Journal. https://www.bizjournals.com/washington/news/2017/01/27/heres-how-different-men-and-women-are-when-it.html ↵
- Underhill, P. (1999). Why We Buy: The Science of Shopping. Touchstone, 99. ↵
- Stephenson, A. (2019, May 16). The shopper transition zone. Explorer Research. https://explorerresearch.com/the-shopper-transition-zone/ ↵
- Biekkola, K. Needs versus wants slide show. Wise-online. http://www.wisc-online.com/objects/index_tj.asp?objID=ABM3302 ↵
- Das, G., Mukherjee, A., & Smith, R. J. (2018). The perfect fit: The moderating role of selling cues on hedonic and utilitarian product types. Journal of Retailing, 94(2), 203–216. https://doi-org.libsecure.camosun.bc.ca:2443/10.1016/j.jretai.2017.12.002 ↵
- Gopal D., Amaradri M. & Ronn J. S. (2018). The Perfect Fit: The Moderating Role of Selling Cues on Hedonic and Utilitarian Product Types, Journal of Retailing, 94(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2017.12.002. ↵